[Author’s Name]
[Institution’s Name]
Essay on Network o/s
Microsoft's Windows Server 2003 is so vast, rich that it's hard to summarize quickly. Indeed, Microsoft is still grappling with the problem of describing Windows Server 2003 accurately to its customers. “It's more secure, more manageable, more performance, more scalable” (Web 2).
While Red Hat Macintosh OSX are best for these kinds of users the ordinary computer user at home, in a school or in a small business and many large enterprises as well those people who just want their computers to work efficiently and be reliable.
Most people should buy a Red Hat Macintosh OSX because Macs are much easier to set up, are still easier to use, are more stable and break down less often, are easier to fix when they do break down have plenty of software available, are virtually free of viruses and are cheaper to buy and maintain.
Microsoft's Windows Server 2003 is also like death by a thousand small cuts: One just doesn't know where to begin, and it's easy to get lost in all the confusion of new features. In a general sense, Microsoft's Windows Server 2003 is simply Microsoft's latest and greatest attempt to scale what had been a departmental and workgroup server ever higher into the domain of Big Iron and high-end UNIX. The key to Windows' value is its incredible focus on the value side. What do you do above that level makes people more productive.
Red Hat software has produced the market-leading version of the open-source software, Linux. Linux is known for its low cost, wide adaptability and stability.
Red Hat's chief executive has said that Linux needs to mature further before home users will get a positive experience from the operating system, saying they should choose Windows instead. Microsoft sees Linux as its most dangerous competitor for desktop operating systems, and after a number of high-profile cases where government departments have switched from Windows to Linux-based systems; the OS has been making some progress.
